Apology of Antioch - Revision history

Detarame at 19:34, 7 February 2009

2009-02-07T19:34:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 7 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Written by the [[Antioch I]], the [[Sorcerer-King]] of Hakan Free City. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]].		Written by the [[Antioch I]], the [[Sorcerer-King]] of Hakan Free City. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]]. It takes the name "Apology" because the only truly coherent parts are an apologia for the pride that led to his original belief that he was the savior designated by the Prophecy that led to his own disastrous, one-man assault on the imprisoned [[Dark Fiend]] in 31 [[BI]].

Detarame at 19:31, 7 February 2009

2009-02-07T19:31:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 7 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Written by the [[Antioch I]], the ~~last King of~~ [[~~Old Hakan~~]]. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]].		Written by the [[Antioch I]], the [[Sorcerer-King]] of Hakan Free City. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]].

Detarame: New page: Written by the Antioch I, the last King of Old Hakan. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Su...

2008-01-27T00:32:54Z

New page: Written by the Antioch I, the last King of Old Hakan. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Su...

New page

Written by the [[Antioch I]], the last King of [[Old Hakan]]. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]].