Talk:Arak - Revision history

207.191.191.20 at 11:52, 1 September 2009

2009-09-01T11:52:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 1 September 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	You're giving him too much credit. Anything that gets mentions more than 5 times is spelled at least two different ways! (not that I'm any better)		You're giving him too much credit. Anything that gets mentions more than 5 times is spelled at least two different ways! (not that I'm any better)
			* We call that "Historic Verisimilitude." -gm

74.68.100.219 at 20:04, 31 August 2009

2009-08-31T20:04:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 31 August 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	** What's the opposite of controversial? -gm		** What's the opposite of controversial? -gm
	*** Uncontroversial or incontrovertible, says the trusty thesaurus. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 00:08, 28 August 2009 (EDT)		*** Uncontroversial or incontrovertible, says the trusty thesaurus. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 00:08, 28 August 2009 (EDT)

			You're giving him too much credit. Anything that gets mentions more than 5 times is spelled at least two different ways! (not that I'm any better)

Slitherrr at 04:08, 28 August 2009

2009-08-28T04:08:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 28 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:00, 26 August 2009 (EDT)		*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:00, 26 August 2009 (EDT)
	** What's the opposite of controversial? -gm		** What's the opposite of controversial? -gm
			*** Uncontroversial or incontrovertible, says the trusty thesaurus. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 00:08, 28 August 2009 (EDT)

96.4.191.21 at 12:10, 27 August 2009

2009-08-27T12:10:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 27 August 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm		Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm
	*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:00, 26 August 2009 (EDT)		*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:00, 26 August 2009 (EDT)
			** What's the opposite of controversial? -gm

Slitherrr at 02:00, 27 August 2009

2009-08-27T02:00:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 27 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm		Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm
	*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so.		*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so. - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:00, 26 August 2009 (EDT)

Slitherrr at 01:59, 27 August 2009

2009-08-27T01:59:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 27 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm		Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm
			*Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so.

75.64.111.120 at 22:28, 26 August 2009

2009-08-26T22:28:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 26 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:48, 25 August 2009 (EDT)		So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:48, 25 August 2009 (EDT)


			Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm

Slitherrr at 02:48, 26 August 2009

2009-08-26T02:48:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 26 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - [[User:~~66.207.92.41~~\|~~66.207.92.41~~]] 22:47, 25 August 2009 (EDT)		So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - [[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 22:48, 25 August 2009 (EDT)

66.207.92.41: New page: So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - ~~~~

2009-08-26T02:47:39Z

New page: So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - ~~~~

New page

So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - [[User:66.207.92.41|66.207.92.41]] 22:47, 25 August 2009 (EDT)