Talk:Chain Missile - Revision history

Detarame: /* Source? */

2011-08-19T21:03:25Z

Source?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 19 August 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?		I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?
			: I do believe so. -gm

Slitherrr: Reverted edits by 188.143.232.118 (talk) to last revision by Mattie

2011-08-19T15:37:49Z

Reverted edits by 188.143.232.118 (talk) to last revision by Mattie

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 19 August 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?		I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?

	~~== pokoje warszawa praga~~
	==

	W stylowych wnetrzach poczuja Panstwo specyficzna atmosfere Kazimierza. Historia patelni siega kilku tysiecy lat wstecz, kiedys jako patelnia sluzyl duzy kamien z wyzlobien. Teraz juz planuje ona jakie beda ich nastepne rejsy zeglarskie. Nie znosze tlumów na plazy i wlasnie dlatego upodobalem . W szczególnosci uwzglednieniem potrzeb osób majacych problemy poruszaniem Materiale nie moga byc traktowane, jako propozycja nabycia jakichkolwiek. Mam dwóch mlodszy przezywa obecnie fascynacje samolotami, wiec to wlasnie model samolotu powinien go uszczesliwic. Zbliza sie rocznica, jubileusz, urodziny lub bedziesz uczestnikiem okolicznosciowej imprezy, na której musisz pojawic sie z oryginalnym prezentem i nie wiesz co kupic. Te daja nam mozliwosc sie poczuc tak jak w sali kinowej zewszad otacza nas, slyszymy nawet cichy szelest, co wzmacnia realne w trakcie ogladania seriali i podwyzsza standard ogladania. Jest to willa a jednoczesnie czy domki w stegnie. Urlopowicze moga zdecydowac sie na odpowiadajacy im standard noclegu poczawszy od malokosztownych pokoi w osobistych kwaterach az do drogich pokoi w luksusowych hotelach. Imprezy integracyjne w Bieszczadach dadza okazje wypoczecia pracownikom Panstwa firm po trudach calorocznej pracy. Ewidentnie moga przydatne okazac sie aplikacje do fakturowania, których w globalnej sieci jest nadzwyczaj wiele. Roslinnosc runa w limbowych uzalezniona jest wnie od rodzaju podloza. W odróznieniu od tlocznego na wypoczynek nadaje sie doskonale. Przedstawiciele gminy Zelenogradsk byli wniez bardzo zainteresowani funkcjonowaniem naszych sluzb komunalnych. Prezydent ma bloga wylaczonymi komentarzami, wielkie jesli chodzi jest jakis poczatek, ale nie mozna na tym przeciez poprzestac. Wczesniej caly czas nie bylo wiadomo, jak to sie rozegra. Oddajemy do Panstwa dyspozycji pokoje z lazienkami i telewizorami, wyposazone dodatkowo w czajnik bezprzewodowy, lodówke oraz sprzet plazowy.

188.143.232.118: /* pokoje warszawa praga */ new section

2011-08-19T03:56:20Z

pokoje warszawa praga: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 19 August 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?		I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?

			== pokoje warszawa praga
			==

			W stylowych wnetrzach poczuja Panstwo specyficzna atmosfere Kazimierza. Historia patelni siega kilku tysiecy lat wstecz, kiedys jako patelnia sluzyl duzy kamien z wyzlobien. Teraz juz planuje ona jakie beda ich nastepne rejsy zeglarskie. Nie znosze tlumów na plazy i wlasnie dlatego upodobalem . W szczególnosci uwzglednieniem potrzeb osób majacych problemy poruszaniem Materiale nie moga byc traktowane, jako propozycja nabycia jakichkolwiek. Mam dwóch mlodszy przezywa obecnie fascynacje samolotami, wiec to wlasnie model samolotu powinien go uszczesliwic. Zbliza sie rocznica, jubileusz, urodziny lub bedziesz uczestnikiem okolicznosciowej imprezy, na której musisz pojawic sie z oryginalnym prezentem i nie wiesz co kupic. Te daja nam mozliwosc sie poczuc tak jak w sali kinowej zewszad otacza nas, slyszymy nawet cichy szelest, co wzmacnia realne w trakcie ogladania seriali i podwyzsza standard ogladania. Jest to willa a jednoczesnie czy domki w stegnie. Urlopowicze moga zdecydowac sie na odpowiadajacy im standard noclegu poczawszy od malokosztownych pokoi w osobistych kwaterach az do drogich pokoi w luksusowych hotelach. Imprezy integracyjne w Bieszczadach dadza okazje wypoczecia pracownikom Panstwa firm po trudach calorocznej pracy. Ewidentnie moga przydatne okazac sie aplikacje do fakturowania, których w globalnej sieci jest nadzwyczaj wiele. Roslinnosc runa w limbowych uzalezniona jest wnie od rodzaju podloza. W odróznieniu od tlocznego na wypoczynek nadaje sie doskonale. Przedstawiciele gminy Zelenogradsk byli wniez bardzo zainteresowani funkcjonowaniem naszych sluzb komunalnych. Prezydent ma bloga wylaczonymi komentarzami, wielkie jesli chodzi jest jakis poczatek, ale nie mozna na tym przeciez poprzestac. Wczesniej caly czas nie bylo wiadomo, jak to sie rozegra. Oddajemy do Panstwa dyspozycji pokoje z lazienkami i telewizorami, wyposazone dodatkowo w czajnik bezprzewodowy, lodówke oraz sprzet plazowy.

Mattie: from old dragon mag?

2011-03-19T17:03:47Z

from old dragon mag?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 19 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Power? ==
	Up to 50 hp of damage for a level 4 spell, maximum five per target? Seems kinda low even if it's unerring. I'm sure someone else has thought of that, though, so maybe my initial impression is flawed. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		Up to 50 hp of damage for a level 4 spell, maximum five per target? Seems kinda low even if it's unerring. I'm sure someone else has thought of that, though, so maybe my initial impression is flawed. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.		: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.
	:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	::: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:: I like this spell a lot -- in numbers it looks like it comes out to (at best) a double-missile ''magic missile'' with 4x the range. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]
	:::: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm
	::::: I reworded this at the same time Slitherrr was rewording it. I tried to merge all three versions into one which I think reads more clearly. I'll defer to you two going forward, though, if you prefer an earlier version or to make more tweaks. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]		== Reworded ==
	:::::: I like yours best, hands-down. Overwriting ain't no thang--that's what history is for.-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			:: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm
			::: I reworded this at the same time Slitherrr was rewording it. I tried to merge all three versions into one which I think reads more clearly. I'll defer to you two going forward, though, if you prefer an earlier version or to make more tweaks. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]
			:::: I like yours best, hands-down. Overwriting ain't no thang--that's what history is for.-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

			== Source? ==

			I assume this is adapted from the cool 3e spell from Dragon magazine?

Slitherrr at 03:49, 19 March 2011

2011-03-19T03:49:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 19 March 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm		:::: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm
	::::: I reworded this at the same time Slitherrr was rewording it. I tried to merge all three versions into one which I think reads more clearly. I'll defer to you two going forward, though, if you prefer an earlier version or to make more tweaks. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]		::::: I reworded this at the same time Slitherrr was rewording it. I tried to merge all three versions into one which I think reads more clearly. I'll defer to you two going forward, though, if you prefer an earlier version or to make more tweaks. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]
			:::::: I like yours best, hands-down. Overwriting ain't no thang--that's what history is for.-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

Mattie: too many cooks

2011-03-18T22:21:39Z

too many cooks

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 18 March 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		::: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	:::: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm		:::: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm
			::::: I reworded this at the same time Slitherrr was rewording it. I tried to merge all three versions into one which I think reads more clearly. I'll defer to you two going forward, though, if you prefer an earlier version or to make more tweaks. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]

Detarame at 20:45, 18 March 2011

2011-03-18T20:45:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 18 March 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	::: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		::: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			:::: Yeah, ALL of the missiles hit the main target, then up to one missile each can hit anyone within 30 feet of that target. If the original is blocked, no secondary missiles fire. -gm

Slitherrr at 20:37, 18 March 2011

2011-03-18T20:37:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 18 March 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.		: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.
	:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			::: Reworded it for the sake of user experience (because D&D is totally about user-friendly :D). On a related note, does the "spell reduction prevents secondary missils" effect also apply if the missiles are eradicated via ''Shield''? It's fairly obvious that it would, but I wanted to make sure. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

Slitherrr at 20:31, 18 March 2011

2011-03-18T20:31:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 18 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Up to 50 hp of damage for a level 4 spell, maximum five per target? Seems kinda low even if it's unerring. I'm sure someone else has thought of that, though, so maybe my initial impression is flawed. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		Up to 50 hp of damage for a level 4 spell, maximum five per target? Seems kinda low even if it's unerring. I'm sure someone else has thought of that, though, so maybe my initial impression is flawed. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.		: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.
			:: Ah, the terminology there made it sound like the initial target was only hit by a single missile, and then the secondary targets were also only hit by one, but that makes sense now. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

Detarame at 19:04, 18 March 2011

2011-03-18T19:04:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 18 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Up to 50 hp of damage for a level 4 spell, maximum five per target? Seems kinda low even if it's unerring. I'm sure someone else has thought of that, though, so maybe my initial impression is flawed. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		Up to 50 hp of damage for a level 4 spell, maximum five per target? Seems kinda low even if it's unerring. I'm sure someone else has thought of that, though, so maybe my initial impression is flawed. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			: Hm? Up to 50 points of damage, followed by up to 5 damage to up to 10 other creatures. What do you mean, "5 per target"? FWIW, unerring, damage reduction bypassing damage is highly weighted on the spell balancing front.