Talk:Feat: Open Minded - Revision history

Mattie: linking example

2011-03-20T19:03:28Z

linking example

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 20 March 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== Requires picking a class? ==		== Requires picking a class? ==

	While coding this into Hero Lab, I realized if you're multiclass you need to pick a class to base this feat on, right? Or in our world do we play that your skill points for all your classes can be spread however you want? (Hero Lab tracks skill pt pools per class.) -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]		While coding this into Hero Lab, I realized if you're multiclass you need to pick a class to base this feat on, right? Or in our world do we play that your skill points for all your classes can be spread however you want? (Hero Lab tracks skill pt pools per class.) I notice our version is described differently [http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/SRD:Open_Minded than this version], so maybe it's different. -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]

Mattie: /* Requires picking a class? */ new section

2011-03-20T19:02:08Z

Requires picking a class?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 20 March 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	-[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]		-[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]

			== Requires picking a class? ==

			While coding this into Hero Lab, I realized if you're multiclass you need to pick a class to base this feat on, right? Or in our world do we play that your skill points for all your classes can be spread however you want? (Hero Lab tracks skill pt pools per class.) -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]

Mattie at 17:46, 16 February 2011

2011-02-16T17:46:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 16 February 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Well, the writers of Complete Adventurer thought five was balanced. Like we talked about, it doesn't allow any bonuses past the normal skill max, unlike the other skill bonus feats, and things like Negotiator effectively add two points each to the two skills involved, disregarding rank maximums. I think, considering that, I would say that five would even be too few, except that the feat can be stacked. All things considered, five seems pretty reasonable. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 17:23, 29 November 2009 (EST)		Well, the writers of Complete Adventurer thought five was balanced. Like we talked about, it doesn't allow any bonuses past the normal skill max, unlike the other skill bonus feats, and things like Negotiator effectively add two points each to the two skills involved, disregarding rank maximums. I think, considering that, I would say that five would even be too few, except that the feat can be stacked. All things considered, five seems pretty reasonable. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 17:23, 29 November 2009 (EST)

			Hmmm... Not only is it spreadable while Skill Focus isn't, but for a low INT character they would take this every time over Skill Focus. It's almost like the Complete Adventurer typo'd and intended this to be targeted solely at out-of-class skills. Heh: If this feat is allowed as-is, I'd really like to see a targeted version for whenever Skill Focus would be available (e.g. for things like [[Templar]]'s granted Ride-based feats).

			-[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]]

Slitherrr at 22:23, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T22:23:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 29 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think this should be four points, at most. Comments? -gm		I think this should be four points, at most. Comments? -gm

			Well, the writers of Complete Adventurer thought five was balanced. Like we talked about, it doesn't allow any bonuses past the normal skill max, unlike the other skill bonus feats, and things like Negotiator effectively add two points each to the two skills involved, disregarding rank maximums. I think, considering that, I would say that five would even be too few, except that the feat can be stacked. All things considered, five seems pretty reasonable. -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]] 17:23, 29 November 2009 (EST)

75.64.111.120: New page: I think this should be four points, at most. Comments? -gm

2009-11-29T22:03:19Z

New page: I think this should be four points, at most. Comments? -gm

New page

I think this should be four points, at most. Comments? -gm