Talk:House Rules - Revision history

Slitherrr at 04:02, 22 June 2014

2014-06-22T04:02:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 22 June 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::: Yeah, but see: "(or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)". Does that must mean some reasoning about what languages the author could communicate in? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:::: Yeah, but see: "(or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)". Does that must mean some reasoning about what languages the author could communicate in? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	::::: I'm dense this morning. Example me. -gm		::::: I'm dense this morning. Example me. -gm
			:::::: 1200 FI document is found in a chest in Odessa, written in Ubrekti. Do we try to figure if the original document-writer shared a language, or do does the check get a -1 by this criteria? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

Detarame at 16:51, 21 June 2014

2014-06-21T16:51:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 21 June 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even an Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm		::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even an Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm
	:::: Yeah, but see: "(or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)". Does that must mean some reasoning about what languages the author could communicate in? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:::: Yeah, but see: "(or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)". Does that must mean some reasoning about what languages the author could communicate in? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			::::: I'm dense this morning. Example me. -gm

Slitherrr at 15:08, 19 June 2014

2014-06-19T15:08:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 19 June 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even an Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm		::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even an Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm
			:::: Yeah, but see: "(or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)". Does that must mean some reasoning about what languages the author could communicate in? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

Detarame: /* Psionic Revivify */

2014-06-19T14:04:48Z

Psionic Revivify

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 19 June 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even ~~and~~ Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm		::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even an Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm

Detarame at 14:04, 19 June 2014

2014-06-19T14:04:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 19 June 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			::: It's virtually impossible for someone to speak only Ubrekti. Even and Ubrekti from Ubrekt is going to have some version of Old Ubrekti as a native language. Speaking only Ubrekt is like trying to write poetry using contract law. -gm

Slitherrr at 06:21, 19 June 2014

2014-06-19T06:21:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 19 June 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	This power says it can be delayed by multiple rounds if you (1) spend XP in 3.5 or (2) take more negative levels in PF. Just to be clear, those extensions are allowed in this setting? -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]] 09:35, 31 July 2013 (EDT)		This power says it can be delayed by multiple rounds if you (1) spend XP in 3.5 or (2) take more negative levels in PF. Just to be clear, those extensions are allowed in this setting? -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]] 09:35, 31 July 2013 (EDT)
	: Yeah. The negative level still puts a short and reasonable cap on how long a rez is really viable, as if you are rez'd with negative levels equal to character levels you'll just die again. I really think it should be one negative level per round instead of per two rounds, but hopefully it won't come up too often. heh. -gm		: Yeah. The negative level still puts a short and reasonable cap on how long a rez is really viable, as if you are rez'd with negative levels equal to character levels you'll just die again. I really think it should be one negative level per round instead of per two rounds, but hopefully it won't come up too often. heh. -gm

			::For linguistic synergy, what if Ubrekti is the only language spoken by that person (or, more likely, what if the document is in Ubrekti)? You're just doomed to the -1?-[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

Detarame at 23:26, 31 July 2013

2013-07-31T23:26:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 31 July 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Psionic Revivify==		==Psionic Revivify==
	This power says it can be delayed by multiple rounds if you (1) spend XP in 3.5 or (2) take more negative levels in PF. Just to be clear, those extensions are allowed in this setting? -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]] 09:35, 31 July 2013 (EDT)		This power says it can be delayed by multiple rounds if you (1) spend XP in 3.5 or (2) take more negative levels in PF. Just to be clear, those extensions are allowed in this setting? -[[User:Mattie\|Mattie]] 09:35, 31 July 2013 (EDT)
			: Yeah. The negative level still puts a short and reasonable cap on how long a rez is really viable, as if you are rez'd with negative levels equal to character levels you'll just die again. I really think it should be one negative level per round instead of per two rounds, but hopefully it won't come up too often. heh. -gm

Mattie: Can Revivify be extended beyond 1 round?

2013-07-31T13:35:11Z

Can Revivify be extended beyond 1 round?

New page

==Psionic Revivify==
This power says it can be delayed by multiple rounds if you (1) spend XP in 3.5 or (2) take more negative levels in PF. Just to be clear, those extensions are allowed in this setting? -[[User:Mattie|Mattie]] 09:35, 31 July 2013 (EDT)