Talk:King Mab's Axe - Revision history

Slitherrr at 07:06, 3 December 2015

2015-12-03T07:06:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 3 December 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
	:: The weapon casts the spell effect on the wielder then it's done. In my mind, it sticks for the duration, but by the rules of how spell-effect items work it would be cast as the spell, so at the very least would be (D)ismissable, although I think that's not a free action. That wouldn't undo the use of the item's ability, for that matter. So, honestly, it's fine if it's a dismissable effect - loss the +1 of the weapon and a standard action. Since you probably are using this ability while "in the shit," those are not marginal costs. Or, you know, you just suck up being tiny and make the best of it which is also interesting. -gm		:: The weapon casts the spell effect on the wielder then it's done. In my mind, it sticks for the duration, but by the rules of how spell-effect items work it would be cast as the spell, so at the very least would be (D)ismissable, although I think that's not a free action. That wouldn't undo the use of the item's ability, for that matter. So, honestly, it's fine if it's a dismissable effect - loss the +1 of the weapon and a standard action. Since you probably are using this ability while "in the shit," those are not marginal costs. Or, you know, you just suck up being tiny and make the best of it which is also interesting. -gm
	::: Well, for the people using a greataxe, I don't know about ''interesting'' really--tiny gilerl loses attacks of opportunity and goes down a ~~damage~~ die and -1/-2 for the sake of +2 to AC. Now if there were rules for throwing him into enemies' faces, on the other hand... -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		::: Well, for the people using a greataxe, I don't know about ''interesting'' really--tiny gilerl loses attacks of opportunity and goes down a die and -1/-2 to damage for the sake of +2 to AC. Now if there were rules for throwing him into enemies' faces, on the other hand... -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])

Slitherrr at 07:06, 3 December 2015

2015-12-03T07:06:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 3 December 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
	:: The weapon casts the spell effect on the wielder then it's done. In my mind, it sticks for the duration, but by the rules of how spell-effect items work it would be cast as the spell, so at the very least would be (D)ismissable, although I think that's not a free action. That wouldn't undo the use of the item's ability, for that matter. So, honestly, it's fine if it's a dismissable effect - loss the +1 of the weapon and a standard action. Since you probably are using this ability while "in the shit," those are not marginal costs. Or, you know, you just suck up being tiny and make the best of it which is also interesting. -gm		:: The weapon casts the spell effect on the wielder then it's done. In my mind, it sticks for the duration, but by the rules of how spell-effect items work it would be cast as the spell, so at the very least would be (D)ismissable, although I think that's not a free action. That wouldn't undo the use of the item's ability, for that matter. So, honestly, it's fine if it's a dismissable effect - loss the +1 of the weapon and a standard action. Since you probably are using this ability while "in the shit," those are not marginal costs. Or, you know, you just suck up being tiny and make the best of it which is also interesting. -gm
			::: Well, for the people using a greataxe, I don't know about ''interesting'' really--tiny gilerl loses attacks of opportunity and goes down a damage die and -1/-2 for the sake of +2 to AC. Now if there were rules for throwing him into enemies' faces, on the other hand... -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])

Detarame at 01:31, 3 December 2015

2015-12-03T01:31:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 3 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can the secondary effect be dismissed and re-cast in subsequent rounds to try to get the wanted effect, or is it "stuck" for the duration? If the axe is passed to another person while the effect is happening, does it transfer that effect as well? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		Can the secondary effect be dismissed and re-cast in subsequent rounds to try to get the wanted effect, or is it "stuck" for the duration? If the axe is passed to another person while the effect is happening, does it transfer that effect as well? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
	:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
			:: The weapon casts the spell effect on the wielder then it's done. In my mind, it sticks for the duration, but by the rules of how spell-effect items work it would be cast as the spell, so at the very least would be (D)ismissable, although I think that's not a free action. That wouldn't undo the use of the item's ability, for that matter. So, honestly, it's fine if it's a dismissable effect - loss the +1 of the weapon and a standard action. Since you probably are using this ability while "in the shit," those are not marginal costs. Or, you know, you just suck up being tiny and make the best of it which is also interesting. -gm

Slitherrr at 14:15, 2 December 2015

2015-12-02T14:15:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 2 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can the secondary effect be dismissed and re-cast in subsequent rounds to try to get the wanted effect, or is it "stuck" for the duration? If the axe is passed to another person while the effect is happening, does it transfer that effect as well? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		Can the secondary effect be dismissed and re-cast in subsequent rounds to try to get the wanted effect, or is it "stuck" for the duration? If the axe is passed to another person while the effect is happening, does it transfer that effect as well? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
			:I feel like the ideal would be, "you have to hold the axe in your hands until the effect expires, and it is not dismissable", theme-wise. But that's not fantastic rules-wise. What if we made it a will save to try to get it to do the one you want, but then you had to accept whatever effect came up for the full ten minutes? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])

Slitherrr at 12:31, 2 December 2015

2015-12-02T12:31:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 2 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I really love this axe. I can't wait~~ to ~~see Gil stay connected long enough~~ to ~~use~~ it~~. -gm~~		Can the secondary effect be dismissed and re-cast in subsequent rounds to try to get the wanted effect, or is it "stuck" for the duration? If the axe is passed to another person while the effect is happening, does it transfer that effect as well? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
	~~:Haha, yeah. I never got a response~~ to the ~~messages I sent to him. I wonder what happened~~? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
	~~:: I assume he's still at school and thus has a spotty connection and/or punative network admins. -gm~~

96.4.191.20 at 15:23, 14 December 2009

2009-12-14T15:23:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 14 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm		I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm
	:Haha, yeah. I never got a response to the messages I sent to him. I wonder what happened? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		:Haha, yeah. I never got a response to the messages I sent to him. I wonder what happened? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			:: I assume he's still at school and thus has a spotty connection and/or punative network admins. -gm

Slitherrr at 15:19, 14 December 2009

2009-12-14T15:19:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 14 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm		I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm
			:Haha, yeah. I never got a response to the messages I sent to him. I wonder what happened? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]

207.191.191.21: New page: I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm

2009-12-14T14:39:39Z

New page: I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm

New page

I really love this axe. I can't wait to see Gil stay connected long enough to use it. -gm