Talk:Sentinel - Revision history

75.64.111.120 at 17:42, 28 July 2009

2009-07-28T17:42:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 28 July 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	----		----
	Good eye on the polearm only feats. I think the balance on this class is looking pretty good now.--[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] 08:44, 28 July 2009 (EDT)		Good eye on the polearm only feats. I think the balance on this class is looking pretty good now.--[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] 08:44, 28 July 2009 (EDT)
			----
			That was one of those things that was obviously supposed to be in there. So obvious I didn't write it down. Good pickup, agreed. -gm

Msallen at 12:44, 28 July 2009

2009-07-28T12:44:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 28 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table. E		Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table. E
	--		----
	Excellent point. Yes, the AoOs and the Whirlwind Attack only apply when using polearms.		Excellent point. Yes, the AoOs and the Whirlwind Attack only apply when using polearms.
			----
			Good eye on the polearm only feats. I think the balance on this class is looking pretty good now.--[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] 08:44, 28 July 2009 (EDT)

75.64.111.120 at 16:39, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T16:39:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 27 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.		Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.

	Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table.		Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table. E
			--
			Excellent point. Yes, the AoOs and the Whirlwind Attack only apply when using polearms.

Slitherrr at 16:31, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T16:31:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 27 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.		Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.

			Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table.

Slitherrr: New page: Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer...

2009-07-27T16:30:11Z

New page: Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer...

New page

Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.