Talk:Protective Interposition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I don't like the fiddly bits as a matter of bookkeeping and game flow, but I think the out-of-sequence mechanic is cute and very in flavor. -gm") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't like the fiddly bits as a matter of bookkeeping and game flow, but I think the out-of-sequence mechanic is cute and very in flavor. -gm | I don't like the fiddly bits as a matter of bookkeeping and game flow, but I think the out-of-sequence mechanic is cute and very in flavor. -gm | ||
: I like Quick Step, also in character. Seems like it would stack with haste, et al. I always like spells in the vein of resurgence. I'm kinda surprised you didn't go with the Crown of Smiting as your first choice. It's awesome! Knight's Move is probably my least favorite of the bunch, though i'll cop to it being in character and I wouldn't mind it as Pal 3. -gm | |||
Totally unrelated to anything, this[[http://dmreference.com/srd/Combat/Movement_Modifiers_Special_Actions/Movement_Position_And_Distance/Tactical_Movement.htm]] is a cool ref site. | |||
Latest revision as of 23:54, 29 June 2012
I don't like the fiddly bits as a matter of bookkeeping and game flow, but I think the out-of-sequence mechanic is cute and very in flavor. -gm
- I like Quick Step, also in character. Seems like it would stack with haste, et al. I always like spells in the vein of resurgence. I'm kinda surprised you didn't go with the Crown of Smiting as your first choice. It's awesome! Knight's Move is probably my least favorite of the bunch, though i'll cop to it being in character and I wouldn't mind it as Pal 3. -gm
Totally unrelated to anything, this[[1]] is a cool ref site.