Talk:Arak: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
You're giving him too much credit. Anything that gets mentions more than 5 times is spelled at least two different ways! (not that I'm any better) | You're giving him too much credit. Anything that gets mentions more than 5 times is spelled at least two different ways! (not that I'm any better) | ||
* We call that "Historic Verisimilitude." -gm | |||
Latest revision as of 11:52, 1 September 2009
So, it's spelled "Arek" several places, and "Arak" in others. Is Arak the spelling, or is there some subtlety here that is not being pointed out? - Slitherrr 22:48, 25 August 2009 (EDT)
Nah, no real subtlety. My stock answer is that, just like in our world, words can have a variety of spellings and so they are both correct. This is a tremendously unsatisfying answer to everyone who does wiki stuff. ;) FWIW, it is pronounced "R-EK" so probably Arek is closer to right. -gm
- Ok. I hope it's not controversial that I made a note to the lack of standardization of the spelling, just to lower the confusion level on reading the article a notch or so. - Slitherrr 22:00, 26 August 2009 (EDT)
- What's the opposite of controversial? -gm
- Uncontroversial or incontrovertible, says the trusty thesaurus. - Slitherrr 00:08, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
- What's the opposite of controversial? -gm
You're giving him too much credit. Anything that gets mentions more than 5 times is spelled at least two different ways! (not that I'm any better)
- We call that "Historic Verisimilitude." -gm