Talk:Petera: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Gunpowder? Guns? I suppose the rationale is that magic keeps those from really being a force to be reckoned with, but then why would melee weapons still be useful? -~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Gunpowder? Guns? I suppose the rationale is that magic keeps those from really being a force to be reckoned with, but then why would melee weapons still be useful? -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 23:12, 4 November 2009 (EST) | Gunpowder? Guns? I suppose the rationale is that magic keeps those from really being a force to be reckoned with, but then why would melee weapons still be useful? -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 23:12, 4 November 2009 (EST) | ||
:: I don't understand the question. They've had firearms for thousands of years, but sometimes melee is still preferred. The British used claymore weilding highlanders through the 17th and 18th centuries, and cavalrymen were attack people with sabres well into the age of artillery. -gm | |||
Revision as of 15:34, 5 November 2009
Gunpowder? Guns? I suppose the rationale is that magic keeps those from really being a force to be reckoned with, but then why would melee weapons still be useful? -Slitherrr 23:12, 4 November 2009 (EST)
- I don't understand the question. They've had firearms for thousands of years, but sometimes melee is still preferred. The British used claymore weilding highlanders through the 17th and 18th centuries, and cavalrymen were attack people with sabres well into the age of artillery. -gm