Talk:Petera: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(I stopped paying attention to spelling when they invented spellcheck. my phone needs to get the fuck up to speed.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | : I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
: PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency | : PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency | ||
:: | :: consistent spelling is an anachronism. | ||
Revision as of 22:37, 21 April 2010
Cleared old talk page. Check history if really interested. -Slitherrr
So this is referred to here and on the map as "Petera", and the adjective is sometimes said to be "Peteran", but a couple of articles have referred to "Petra" and "Petran", or "Petara" and "Petaran". Is it safe to assume that "Petera" and "Peteran" are canonical (flavor element of misspellings aside)? -Slitherrr
- I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --Msallen
- PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency
- consistent spelling is an anachronism.