Talk:Kimika's Character Sheet: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Yes, I never took one but I'd like to take leadership. We also had the idea that Kimi could stay somewhere & brew potions while her cohort went around with the party. --[[User:HelenAngel|HelenAngel]] 09:09, 29 June 2011 (EDT) | :Yes, I never took one but I'd like to take leadership. We also had the idea that Kimi could stay somewhere & brew potions while her cohort went around with the party. --[[User:HelenAngel|HelenAngel]] 09:09, 29 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
:: Holy crap--we are going to have an army! This is some wheel of time shit here. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | :: Holy crap--we are going to have an army! This is some wheel of time shit here. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
::: Leadership is going to be tough to work in for awhile, but I could make it work - like I told mattie, after the seige. Also, I don't understand why you'd leave Kimi behind and send someone level 8 with the party instead? -gm | |||
:::: I want to see a character with a cohort that gets leadership with a cohort that gets leadership with a cohort that gets leadership. I think that'd be possible right around level 12.-[[Special:Contributions/206.248.250.8|206.248.250.8]] | |||
::::: There is actually a rule, I think from LG, that prevents cohorts from having cohorts. But, Mattie's eventual cohort actually does have leadership and her own followers. -gm | |||
:::::: Really? I don't see why. Apart from the fact that you (the GM, not the general you) control the feat choices, if a cohort wants to spend a feat to get a cohort, more power to them, right? -[[Special:Contributions/206.248.250.8|206.248.250.8]] | |||
::::::: Well, there is actually a rule that says the GM can choose not to deal with Leadership at all if he chooses not to, which by extension probably applies here. I can think of lots of reasons why cohorts shouldn't be able to get cohorts, and most of them revolve around a player controlling 3+ characters at the table. In any case, Germ could do this now. --[[User:Msallen]] | |||
:::::::: Well, that's the thing, the player doesn't really control all of them, he just has executive input on the top one. -[[Special:Contributions/206.248.250.8|206.248.250.8]] | |||
::::::::: Yeah, but then it's another thing for the GM to fret over, which is probably worse! --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] |
Latest revision as of 17:46, 1 July 2011
Is Kimika missing her 9th level feat?
- Yes, I never took one but I'd like to take leadership. We also had the idea that Kimi could stay somewhere & brew potions while her cohort went around with the party. --HelenAngel 09:09, 29 June 2011 (EDT)
- Holy crap--we are going to have an army! This is some wheel of time shit here. --Msallen
- Leadership is going to be tough to work in for awhile, but I could make it work - like I told mattie, after the seige. Also, I don't understand why you'd leave Kimi behind and send someone level 8 with the party instead? -gm
- I want to see a character with a cohort that gets leadership with a cohort that gets leadership with a cohort that gets leadership. I think that'd be possible right around level 12.-206.248.250.8
- There is actually a rule, I think from LG, that prevents cohorts from having cohorts. But, Mattie's eventual cohort actually does have leadership and her own followers. -gm
- Really? I don't see why. Apart from the fact that you (the GM, not the general you) control the feat choices, if a cohort wants to spend a feat to get a cohort, more power to them, right? -206.248.250.8
- Well, there is actually a rule that says the GM can choose not to deal with Leadership at all if he chooses not to, which by extension probably applies here. I can think of lots of reasons why cohorts shouldn't be able to get cohorts, and most of them revolve around a player controlling 3+ characters at the table. In any case, Germ could do this now. --User:Msallen
- Well, that's the thing, the player doesn't really control all of them, he just has executive input on the top one. -206.248.250.8
- Yeah, but then it's another thing for the GM to fret over, which is probably worse! --Msallen
- Well, that's the thing, the player doesn't really control all of them, he just has executive input on the top one. -206.248.250.8
- Well, there is actually a rule that says the GM can choose not to deal with Leadership at all if he chooses not to, which by extension probably applies here. I can think of lots of reasons why cohorts shouldn't be able to get cohorts, and most of them revolve around a player controlling 3+ characters at the table. In any case, Germ could do this now. --User:Msallen
- Really? I don't see why. Apart from the fact that you (the GM, not the general you) control the feat choices, if a cohort wants to spend a feat to get a cohort, more power to them, right? -206.248.250.8
- There is actually a rule, I think from LG, that prevents cohorts from having cohorts. But, Mattie's eventual cohort actually does have leadership and her own followers. -gm
- I want to see a character with a cohort that gets leadership with a cohort that gets leadership with a cohort that gets leadership. I think that'd be possible right around level 12.-206.248.250.8
- Leadership is going to be tough to work in for awhile, but I could make it work - like I told mattie, after the seige. Also, I don't understand why you'd leave Kimi behind and send someone level 8 with the party instead? -gm
- Holy crap--we are going to have an army! This is some wheel of time shit here. --Msallen