Category talk:Fire Magic Feats: Difference between revisions

From Sourcebook Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I believe these are actually metamagic feats as well.")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I believe these are actually metamagic feats as well.
I believe these are actually metamagic feats as well.
: Yeah, I made a bunch of extra feat categories just for sorting purposes that aren't official 'feat types'. I marked those grouping types at the top of their category pages. For these specific fire spells I marked them Metamagic first but I went back and added the "Fire Magic" category just to group them together. If you'd rather I categorize the non-special types separately, that's some work but doable, but I didn't think it would harm anything. When a feat type has a special meaning (like Exalted, Divine, Metamagic, etc) then we can describe it on its category page. The others are just used for ease of reference (and I wished the SRD did more of that, actually). -[[User:Mattie|Mattie]]

Latest revision as of 01:37, 17 February 2011

I believe these are actually metamagic feats as well.

Yeah, I made a bunch of extra feat categories just for sorting purposes that aren't official 'feat types'. I marked those grouping types at the top of their category pages. For these specific fire spells I marked them Metamagic first but I went back and added the "Fire Magic" category just to group them together. If you'd rather I categorize the non-special types separately, that's some work but doable, but I didn't think it would harm anything. When a feat type has a special meaning (like Exalted, Divine, Metamagic, etc) then we can describe it on its category page. The others are just used for ease of reference (and I wished the SRD did more of that, actually). -Mattie