Talk:Mikos Lygit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: When we put Mikos up against the entries on Mythrian or Sterros or Sayid, he's still clearly a stub, I'd say. -gm | : When we put Mikos up against the entries on Mythrian or Sterros or Sayid, he's still clearly a stub, I'd say. -gm | ||
:: Sure, but isn't that setting the bar a little high? | :: Sure, but isn't that setting the bar a little high? | ||
:: A more relevant comment: we already referred to Sayid's revolt as the "Peteran Civil War", although given that Sayid won, he would probably have branded it a "revolution" and not a "civil war". How to you want to differentiate the two? Was the war following Mikos' ousting a full civil war, or was it more of a rebellion? Want to assume Sayid branded his own victory better than a civil war? | :: A more relevant comment: we already referred to Sayid's revolt as the "Peteran Civil War", although given that Sayid won, he would probably have branded it a "revolution" and not a "civil war". How to you want to differentiate the two? Was the war following Mikos' ousting a full civil war, or was it more of a rebellion? Want to assume Sayid branded his own victory better than a civil war? --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 23 April 2010
Neat! Is it still a stub, or should the tag be removed? --Msallen
- When we put Mikos up against the entries on Mythrian or Sterros or Sayid, he's still clearly a stub, I'd say. -gm
- Sure, but isn't that setting the bar a little high?
- A more relevant comment: we already referred to Sayid's revolt as the "Peteran Civil War", although given that Sayid won, he would probably have branded it a "revolution" and not a "civil war". How to you want to differentiate the two? Was the war following Mikos' ousting a full civil war, or was it more of a rebellion? Want to assume Sayid branded his own victory better than a civil war? --Msallen