Talk:Feat: Improved Aid Another: Difference between revisions

From Sourcebook Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
:::: For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]]
:::: For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]]
::::: That certainly doesn't make the think it's under powered >:)
::::: That certainly doesn't make the think it's under powered >:)
:::::: I do SOME things for flavor, and that was one. It might not have won out against save boosters, but since I do a huge amount of aiding it was on my list. A feat that only allows you to boost someone an extra +1 when you give up your own action is pretty weak. --[[Special:Contributions/74.68.100.149|74.68.100.149]]
:::::: More like Matt is running out of skill-based feats to take with his Prof bonus slots. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]]

Revision as of 13:39, 17 February 2011

Stronger alternative?

The Net Book of Feats community authors recommend this feat as a +4 bonus instead: http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Improved_Aid_Another_%283.5e_Feat%29 -- Do we want to adopt that one?

I want to vote in favor of this. -Slitherrr
I'm sure MA will vote in favor of it, too.
It makes perfect sense. Attack ability increases as levels go up, but Aid Another doesn't. Giving up a feat slot for an extra +1 that you still have to give up an attack for is just silly. -Slitherrr
For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --Msallen
That certainly doesn't make the think it's under powered >:)
More like Matt is running out of skill-based feats to take with his Prof bonus slots. -Slitherrr
Retrieved from "https://wiki.memphisgamers.com/index.php?title=Talk:Feat:_Improved_Aid_Another&oldid=7720"