Talk:Sylvan (Language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:35, 17 March 2010

Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -Slitherrr

I'd say it doesn't. I don't think it's a language like we understand it, and I don't think it can impart terribly complex ideas. -gm

Revision as of 18:57, 16 March 2010 (view source) Slitherrr (talk \| contribs) (New page: Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -~~~)		Revision as of 00:35, 17 March 2010 (view source) 75.64.111.120 (talk) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]		Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -[[User:Slitherrr\|Slitherrr]]
			: I'd say it doesn't. I don't think it's a language like we understand it, and I don't think it can impart terribly complex ideas. -gm