Talk:Gilerl's Character Sheet
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Should have 8x4 = 32 skill points.
Has Climb: 3 + Hide(CC): 10 + Jump: 3 + Listen: 1 + Move Silently(CC): 6 + Survival: 5 + Swim: 3 + Use Magic Device(CC): 4 = 35 points. -Slitherrr
Dude evidently loves cross-class skills. Also, 10 is too many points in Hide (max is 8). -Slitherrr
Also, the optimizer in me is shrieking. -Slitherrr
- That should be an easy fix?
- Yeah, Gil's easy to fix, just drop both extra points in Hide and a point somewhere else. To be perfectly honest, he should drop the four points in UMD, because there's very little he can activate with that level, but he might not want to do that. -Slitherrr
- Yeah, maybe. 2 of those ranks are probably the gnome bonus ranks, though. ;)
- Ah. He would have two more ranks in listen then, too, probably, but yeah that changes things. He's down a point if that's the case.
- Also, worth noting that the bonus isn't ranks, it's a racial bonus, which Gilerl may not have distinguished.-Slitherrr
- Normally true, ya, but Hakani Gnomes' UMD is an exception in this case: they actually get 2 bonus ranks in addition to being able to add their INT bonus. Otherwise, without ranks, you can't even make the check no matter what bonuses you get. It might be easier just to say "Hakani Gnomes may use UMD untrained." :) -gm
- Good plan. Ok, in that case, he has one more point to spend. -Slitherrr
- It'll also cost Thed 2 ranks of UMD, though his check will be unchanged. (And can even go higher this way!)
- Yeah, maybe. 2 of those ranks are probably the gnome bonus ranks, though. ;)
- Yeah, Gil's easy to fix, just drop both extra points in Hide and a point somewhere else. To be perfectly honest, he should drop the four points in UMD, because there's very little he can activate with that level, but he might not want to do that. -Slitherrr
Did we re-spec Gil as a Wild Gnome yet? -Slitherrr
What language did he pick up? -Slitherrr
Is Gil calculating his hitpoints correctly? This sheet is old as balls, but at level 6 I get (12 + 2) + (11 + 2)x5 = 79, not 65. -Slitherrr