Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feat: Improved Aid Another"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: It makes perfect sense. Attack ability increases as levels go up, but Aid Another doesn't. Giving up a feat slot for an extra +1 that you still have to give up an attack for is just silly. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ::: It makes perfect sense. Attack ability increases as levels go up, but Aid Another doesn't. Giving up a feat slot for an extra +1 that you still have to give up an attack for is just silly. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
:::: For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | :::: For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
| + | ::::: That certainly doesn't make the think it's under powered >:) | ||
Revision as of 23:11, 16 February 2011
Stronger alternative?
The Net Book of Feats community authors recommend this feat as a +4 bonus instead: http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Improved_Aid_Another_%283.5e_Feat%29 -- Do we want to adopt that one?
- I want to vote in favor of this. -Slitherrr
- I'm sure MA will vote in favor of it, too.
- It makes perfect sense. Attack ability increases as levels go up, but Aid Another doesn't. Giving up a feat slot for an extra +1 that you still have to give up an attack for is just silly. -Slitherrr
- For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --Msallen
- That certainly doesn't make the think it's under powered >:)
- For the record, I am, of course, in favor of it. I was going to take it at +3. --Msallen
- It makes perfect sense. Attack ability increases as levels go up, but Aid Another doesn't. Giving up a feat slot for an extra +1 that you still have to give up an attack for is just silly. -Slitherrr
- I'm sure MA will vote in favor of it, too.
