Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mikos Lygit"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Neat! Is it still a stub, or should the tag be removed? --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | Neat! Is it still a stub, or should the tag be removed? --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
: When we put Mikos up against the entries on Mythrian or Sterros or Sayid, he's still clearly a stub, I'd say. -gm | : When we put Mikos up against the entries on Mythrian or Sterros or Sayid, he's still clearly a stub, I'd say. -gm | ||
| + | :: Sure, but isn't that setting the bar a little high? | ||
| + | :: A more relevant comment: we already referred to Sayid's revolt as the "Peteran Civil War", although given that Sayid won, he would probably have branded it a "revolution" and not a "civil war". How to you want to differentiate the two? Was the war following Mikos' ousting a full civil war, or was it more of a rebellion? Want to assume Sayid branded his own victory better than a civil war? | ||
Revision as of 15:43, 23 April 2010
Neat! Is it still a stub, or should the tag be removed? --Msallen
- When we put Mikos up against the entries on Mythrian or Sterros or Sayid, he's still clearly a stub, I'd say. -gm
- Sure, but isn't that setting the bar a little high?
- A more relevant comment: we already referred to Sayid's revolt as the "Peteran Civil War", although given that Sayid won, he would probably have branded it a "revolution" and not a "civil war". How to you want to differentiate the two? Was the war following Mikos' ousting a full civil war, or was it more of a rebellion? Want to assume Sayid branded his own victory better than a civil war?
