Talk:Bard

From Sourcebook Wiki
Revision as of 19:54, 28 February 2013 by Msallen (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "Regarding PF bards, this [http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/core-classes/bard#TOC-Versatile-Performance-Ex- versatile performance] seems to be a big source of confusion because the...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Regarding PF bards, this versatile performance seems to be a big source of confusion because the rules as written don't use well-defined or clear terms. The crux of the issue is, when you sub your perform for a skill, which bonuses/penalties for the subbed skill apply? James Jacobs weighs in here, but I don't think he really sheds light on the issue, and he provides both opinions and rules readings. Since PF Germ is likely to be a bard, I think we should make a quick house rule. Here are the possible implementations of what gets subbed:

option subbed not subbed notes
1 ranks, class skill stat, feats, class buffs, situational ranks and class skills seemed to be the minimum that is covered from the RAW
2 ranks, class skill, stat feats, class buffs, situational stat seems to be a reasonable inclusion, but is a little more powerful since you can sub cha for other weaker stats
3 ranks, class skill, stat, feats class buffs, situational you can focus on perform buff feats and reduce feat eficiency, although perform has a few less feat options
4 ranks, class skill, stat, feats, class buffs situational situational should never be subbed (this would mean using dance/acrobatics substitution in heavy armor with no penalty) but class buffs (like inquisitor's stern gaze, master spy's art of deception) seem special enough that they should be retained, and there is no perform class buff so this hurts a lot of prestige classes that are natural for a bard

I think 1 and 2 are the fairest and most in line with the intention--they help bard efficiency, but do not help with feat efficiency, and do not hurt special class skills. Is there a GM opinion? --Msallen