Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feat: Prodigy"

From Sourcebook Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(nerfed)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I agree its a cool feat, but it could very well allow players to hit prestige classes with rank-based prereqs a level earlier. For some of our 'prestige lite' classes, this could make them accessible at level 3. You ok with that? --[[User:192.147.58.6|192.147.58.6]] 11:16, 7 December 2009 (EST)
 
I agree its a cool feat, but it could very well allow players to hit prestige classes with rank-based prereqs a level earlier. For some of our 'prestige lite' classes, this could make them accessible at level 3. You ok with that? --[[User:192.147.58.6|192.147.58.6]] 11:16, 7 December 2009 (EST)
 
:: Actually, I kind of am. In fact, thinking about it, I'd say that's probably the primary use of the feat. To become expert at something before most people. That's almost the definition of a prodigy, right there! I wish I could say that was the intent. I thought that the feat was a little watered down, but yeah, I like it more now, not less. -gm
 
:: Actually, I kind of am. In fact, thinking about it, I'd say that's probably the primary use of the feat. To become expert at something before most people. That's almost the definition of a prodigy, right there! I wish I could say that was the intent. I thought that the feat was a little watered down, but yeah, I like it more now, not less. -gm
 +
 +
== Nerfing ==
 +
Still a decent feat, but it did have munchkiny potential. That's what I get for bragging about an experimental Rog 1 / Prof 1 / Assassin 1. So much for "liking it more now" as he said above. ;) I think it's a great fix, though. -[[User:Mattie|Mattie]]

Revision as of 16:37, 6 May 2011

Wow. Cool feat. -Slitherrr 15:18, 1 December 2009 (EST)

Thanks, I'm pretty proud of the few home-made feats I've thrown up so far. -gm

I agree its a cool feat, but it could very well allow players to hit prestige classes with rank-based prereqs a level earlier. For some of our 'prestige lite' classes, this could make them accessible at level 3. You ok with that? --192.147.58.6 11:16, 7 December 2009 (EST)

Actually, I kind of am. In fact, thinking about it, I'd say that's probably the primary use of the feat. To become expert at something before most people. That's almost the definition of a prodigy, right there! I wish I could say that was the intent. I thought that the feat was a little watered down, but yeah, I like it more now, not less. -gm

Nerfing

Still a decent feat, but it did have munchkiny potential. That's what I get for bragging about an experimental Rog 1 / Prof 1 / Assassin 1. So much for "liking it more now" as he said above. ;) I think it's a great fix, though. -Mattie