Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sentinel"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table. E | Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table. E | ||
| − | -- | + | ---- |
Excellent point. Yes, the AoOs and the Whirlwind Attack only apply when using polearms. | Excellent point. Yes, the AoOs and the Whirlwind Attack only apply when using polearms. | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Good eye on the polearm only feats. I think the balance on this class is looking pretty good now.--[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] 08:44, 28 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | That was one of those things that was obviously supposed to be in there. So obvious I didn't write it down. Good pickup, agreed. -gm | ||
Latest revision as of 13:42, 28 July 2009
Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.
Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table. E
Excellent point. Yes, the AoOs and the Whirlwind Attack only apply when using polearms.
Good eye on the polearm only feats. I think the balance on this class is looking pretty good now.--Msallen 08:44, 28 July 2009 (EDT)
That was one of those things that was obviously supposed to be in there. So obvious I didn't write it down. Good pickup, agreed. -gm
