Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eyeleech"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*blink* I did not see THAT one coming. -gm | *blink* I did not see THAT one coming. -gm | ||
: I was reading through the Book of Aberrations, which has a section on Beholders. This popped into my head as too delicious a possibility to ignore. Also, we already know that Beholders are canon, so I figured making these a rare-yet-possibly-Earth-shattering possibility would make for some potentially interesting and dismally party-destructive antics later on. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 18:27, 7 December 2009 (EST) | : I was reading through the Book of Aberrations, which has a section on Beholders. This popped into my head as too delicious a possibility to ignore. Also, we already know that Beholders are canon, so I figured making these a rare-yet-possibly-Earth-shattering possibility would make for some potentially interesting and dismally party-destructive antics later on. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 18:27, 7 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | :: I like the way you think. -gm | ||
Latest revision as of 20:03, 7 December 2009
- blink* I did not see THAT one coming. -gm
- I was reading through the Book of Aberrations, which has a section on Beholders. This popped into my head as too delicious a possibility to ignore. Also, we already know that Beholders are canon, so I figured making these a rare-yet-possibly-Earth-shattering possibility would make for some potentially interesting and dismally party-destructive antics later on. -Slitherrr 18:27, 7 December 2009 (EST)
- I like the way you think. -gm
