Difference between revisions of "Talk:Field Marshall (3.5)"
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
What are this class's class skills? Also, it seems weird to have 5 points per level--perhaps it should be either 6 or 4? | What are this class's class skills? Also, it seems weird to have 5 points per level--perhaps it should be either 6 or 4? | ||
| − | Attribute scores make horrible prerequisites, because they're almost impossible to improve, and can make the desired minimum character level for a class ridiculously high if the character doesn't happen to start with the right stats (barring the mysterious appearance of Manuals of X). It might be useful to consider what the desired minimum level is for characters who take this class, and what he should be focused in. The Leadership feat isn't available until character level 6, for example, so that puts a hard level minimum for anyone. The BAB requirement doesn't change the minimum level for fighting classes, and increases it a bit for non-fighting classes. If the class is mostly made | + | Attribute scores make horrible prerequisites, because they're almost impossible to improve, and can make the desired minimum character level for a class ridiculously high if the character doesn't happen to start with the right stats (barring the mysterious appearance of Manuals of X). It might be useful to consider what the desired minimum level is for characters who take this class, and what he should be focused in. The Leadership feat isn't available until character level 6, for example, so that puts a hard level minimum for anyone. The BAB requirement doesn't change the minimum level for fighting classes, and increases it a bit for non-fighting classes. If the class is mostly made for charismatic fighty types, then perhaps minimum ranks in Diplomacy and some sort of Knowledge might make more sense (both being Paladin and Cleric class skills, although Clerics have different Knowledge class skills than Paladins). This tends to exclude people with mainly Fighter levels, but so does having a 14 in Charisma, which Fighters have little use for. A Diplomatic feat like Negotiator might make sense, also. [[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 14:56, 22 July 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:59, 22 July 2009
So this class has some attractive abilities, but I'm wondering if they're attractive enough, considering. I don't really have a feel for how useful the NPC companions are, I suppose. The +1 bonus seems fairly paltry for only working in a 10 foot radius, but maybe I underestimate the usefulness of +1 to all rolls. In fact, I'm probably really underestimating the usefulness, now that I think about it.
What are this class's class skills? Also, it seems weird to have 5 points per level--perhaps it should be either 6 or 4?
Attribute scores make horrible prerequisites, because they're almost impossible to improve, and can make the desired minimum character level for a class ridiculously high if the character doesn't happen to start with the right stats (barring the mysterious appearance of Manuals of X). It might be useful to consider what the desired minimum level is for characters who take this class, and what he should be focused in. The Leadership feat isn't available until character level 6, for example, so that puts a hard level minimum for anyone. The BAB requirement doesn't change the minimum level for fighting classes, and increases it a bit for non-fighting classes. If the class is mostly made for charismatic fighty types, then perhaps minimum ranks in Diplomacy and some sort of Knowledge might make more sense (both being Paladin and Cleric class skills, although Clerics have different Knowledge class skills than Paladins). This tends to exclude people with mainly Fighter levels, but so does having a 14 in Charisma, which Fighters have little use for. A Diplomatic feat like Negotiator might make sense, also. Slitherrr 14:56, 22 July 2009 (EDT)
