Difference between revisions of "Talk:Notes for Game 2010-02-26"
From Sourcebook Wiki
(ujuiGVmggtNhmKp) |
m (Reverted edits by 173.255.122.132 (talk) to last revision by 75.64.111.120) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | This line was hilarious: | |
| + | |||
| + | Edrell and Germain accuse each other of treason, laughs and back-pats result. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Love it! --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Digging the new tokens on the wiki, mattie. -gm | ||
| + | : They are pretty awesome, although I think we should keep them to quest notes, and not use them in articles? --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
| + | :: 110% agreement. | ||
| + | ::: :( I don't like that rule-- would rather have them be mentioned at author's description on the first "link" or mention in an article sometimes. But you guys can do what you like on that, I guess. -[[User:Mattie|Mattie]] 18:04, 11 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::: Huh? I don't get what you are saying | ||
Latest revision as of 23:34, 28 October 2011
This line was hilarious:
Edrell and Germain accuse each other of treason, laughs and back-pats result.
Love it! --Msallen
Digging the new tokens on the wiki, mattie. -gm
- They are pretty awesome, although I think we should keep them to quest notes, and not use them in articles? --Msallen
- 110% agreement.
- :( I don't like that rule-- would rather have them be mentioned at author's description on the first "link" or mention in an article sometimes. But you guys can do what you like on that, I guess. -Mattie 18:04, 11 April 2010 (EDT)
- Huh? I don't get what you are saying
- :( I don't like that rule-- would rather have them be mentioned at author's description on the first "link" or mention in an article sometimes. But you guys can do what you like on that, I guess. -Mattie 18:04, 11 April 2010 (EDT)
- 110% agreement.
