Difference between revisions of "Talk:Petera"

From Sourcebook Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Religious tolerance of Peteran Heresy?: new section)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
::: Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably
 
::: Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably
 
::::Note: Wikis are an anachronism. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]]
 
::::Note: Wikis are an anachronism. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]]
 +
 +
== Religious tolerance of Peteran Heresy? ==
 +
 +
How tolerant are Mainlanders day-to-day of Peteran Heresy religion? Are they generally accepting and on good terms (for day-to-day Mainlanders) or do they view them as blasphemers? Any real-world analogies? I can tell the churches themselves are opposed (i.e. "Peteran Heresy" name), but how does that translate into day-to-day relationships for (a) citizens of the countries and (b) members of the church? -[[User:Mattie|Mattie]]

Revision as of 12:11, 5 April 2011

This entry maybe should be brought into line with other national entries, format wise. -gm

Cleared old talk page. Check history if really interested. -Slitherrr


So this is referred to here and on the map as "Petera", and the adjective is sometimes said to be "Peteran", but a couple of articles have referred to "Petra" and "Petran", or "Petara" and "Petaran". Is it safe to assume that "Petera" and "Peteran" are canonical (flavor element of misspellings aside)? -Slitherrr

I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --Msallen
Yeah, I got into the redirects before I knew what I was getting into. -Slitherrr
PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency
consistent spelling is an anachronism.
Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably
Note: Wikis are an anachronism. -Slitherrr

Religious tolerance of Peteran Heresy?

How tolerant are Mainlanders day-to-day of Peteran Heresy religion? Are they generally accepting and on good terms (for day-to-day Mainlanders) or do they view them as blasphemers? Any real-world analogies? I can tell the churches themselves are opposed (i.e. "Peteran Heresy" name), but how does that translate into day-to-day relationships for (a) citizens of the countries and (b) members of the church? -Mattie