Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sylvan (Language)"
From Sourcebook Wiki
(New page: Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
| + | : I'd say it doesn't. I don't think it's a language like we understand it, and I don't think it can impart terribly complex ideas. -gm | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 16 March 2010
Do we have a statement from on high on where Sylvan fits in, so I can add it to the super-list? -Slitherrr
- I'd say it doesn't. I don't think it's a language like we understand it, and I don't think it can impart terribly complex ideas. -gm
