Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elk Rider"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Bullshit up here cleared out. History if interested. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 17:02, 10 May 2010 (EDT) | Bullshit up here cleared out. History if interested. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 17:02, 10 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Any reference on Improved Weapon Specialization, or is Greater Weapon Specialization what is meant? Also, if prereqs need to be met, then those bonus feats are going to be limited to people with at least four/twelve Fighter levels, which is quite a lot of investment in Fighter for a class that's probably more of a Ranger thing. Alternatively, you could add a caveat that Ranger/Elk-Rider levels count as fighter levels for the purposes of those two feats with bows only, which seems pretty reasonable. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Alright - Let's do this! Step one : Find good Deer/Elk stats. http://www.enworld.org/forum/d-d-legacy-discussion/165569-stats-deer.html | Alright - Let's do this! Step one : Find good Deer/Elk stats. http://www.enworld.org/forum/d-d-legacy-discussion/165569-stats-deer.html | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
: So I should have taken that rank of ride I was considering eh.. hrm. Could be an interesting thing. Though someone is bound to recognize that connection and get my elf but captured. :-P | : So I should have taken that rank of ride I was considering eh.. hrm. Could be an interesting thing. Though someone is bound to recognize that connection and get my elf but captured. :-P | ||
:: There's nobody around to train you (that we know of), but that may just mean you'd be the origin of a rebirth of the discipline. If that's the case, you'll be so important that you're almost *guaranteed* to be captured. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | :: There's nobody around to train you (that we know of), but that may just mean you'd be the origin of a rebirth of the discipline. If that's the case, you'll be so important that you're almost *guaranteed* to be captured. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
| + | ::: But don't worry, because we got your back, girl. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
| − | + | {| class="collapsible collapsed wikitable" | |
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Elk Stats hidden 08:47, 12 November 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | | ||
Dire Elk<br /> | Dire Elk<br /> | ||
Huge Animal<br /> | Huge Animal<br /> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 55: | ||
advancement: 4-10 HD (Large) <br /> | advancement: 4-10 HD (Large) <br /> | ||
Level Adjustment: -- <br /> | Level Adjustment: -- <br /> | ||
| − | + | |} | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 09:47, 12 November 2010
Bullshit up here cleared out. History if interested. -Slitherrr 17:02, 10 May 2010 (EDT)
Any reference on Improved Weapon Specialization, or is Greater Weapon Specialization what is meant? Also, if prereqs need to be met, then those bonus feats are going to be limited to people with at least four/twelve Fighter levels, which is quite a lot of investment in Fighter for a class that's probably more of a Ranger thing. Alternatively, you could add a caveat that Ranger/Elk-Rider levels count as fighter levels for the purposes of those two feats with bows only, which seems pretty reasonable. -Slitherrr
Alright - Let's do this! Step one : Find good Deer/Elk stats. http://www.enworld.org/forum/d-d-legacy-discussion/165569-stats-deer.html
- I should have at least one of those references, so I'll take a look when I get home and remember. -Slitherrr
- So I should have taken that rank of ride I was considering eh.. hrm. Could be an interesting thing. Though someone is bound to recognize that connection and get my elf but captured. :-P
| Elk Stats hidden 08:47, 12 November 2010 (EST) |
|---|
|
Dire Elk I should be able to get regular Elk stats, too, in a bit here. -Slitherrr Elk (via World of Warcraft Manual of Monsters) |
