Difference between revisions of "Talk:Psionics"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why get rid of the magic/psionics transparency rule? That's a lot of work and adjuctating on the side of the GM. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | Why get rid of the magic/psionics transparency rule? That's a lot of work and adjuctating on the side of the GM. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
| + | : Because I don't care and because I want psionics to be different, as it traditionally has been in D&D and in this setting. In terms of metaphysics, there's no reason a nonmagical, personally generated power should effect magic and vice versa. -gm | ||
Revision as of 13:05, 28 April 2011
I am hoping that Mattie, who is way more crunch-minded than me (and the one who is going to have to put up with Psionic character or characters) will help me make rules that are more concrete and less hand wavy. Discussion is welcome!
Why get rid of the magic/psionics transparency rule? That's a lot of work and adjuctating on the side of the GM. --Msallen
- Because I don't care and because I want psionics to be different, as it traditionally has been in D&D and in this setting. In terms of metaphysics, there's no reason a nonmagical, personally generated power should effect magic and vice versa. -gm
