Difference between revisions of "Commentaries"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Commentaries]] are works of analysis written about the [[Prophecies of Alabar Tremaline]]. They are the primary source of knowledge about the [[First Gods]], as well as the [[Demigods]]. Those of [[Commentaries of Josaphalia|Josaphalia]], [[Commentaries of Middrell|Middrell]], [[Commentaries of Teldar Stoneweld|Teldar Stoneweld]], [[Commentaries of Erathol|Erathol]], and [[Commentaries of Antioch|Antioch]] are seen as most authoritative. | The [[Commentaries]] are works of analysis written about the [[Prophecies of Alabar Tremaline]]. They are the primary source of knowledge about the [[First Gods]], as well as the [[Demigods]]. Those of [[Commentaries of Josaphalia|Josaphalia]], [[Commentaries of Middrell|Middrell]], [[Commentaries of Teldar Stoneweld|Teldar Stoneweld]], [[Commentaries of Erathol|Erathol]], and [[Commentaries of Antioch|Antioch]] are seen as most authoritative. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The commentaries run the gauntlet, from philosophical to technical. In addition to their value as primary sources about pre-Alexandrian times, they are also commonly studied at the University level by those interested in metaphysics and arcanics, particularly those interested in the study of divination. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:33, 15 December 2009
The Commentaries are works of analysis written about the Prophecies of Alabar Tremaline. They are the primary source of knowledge about the First Gods, as well as the Demigods. Those of Josaphalia, Middrell, Teldar Stoneweld, Erathol, and Antioch are seen as most authoritative.
The commentaries run the gauntlet, from philosophical to technical. In addition to their value as primary sources about pre-Alexandrian times, they are also commonly studied at the University level by those interested in metaphysics and arcanics, particularly those interested in the study of divination.
