Difference between revisions of "Talk:Petera"

From Sourcebook Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
This entry maybe should be brought into line with other national entries, format wise. -gm
 +
 
Cleared old talk page. Check history if really interested. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]]
 
Cleared old talk page. Check history if really interested. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]]
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 10:17, 18 June 2010

This entry maybe should be brought into line with other national entries, format wise. -gm

Cleared old talk page. Check history if really interested. -Slitherrr


So this is referred to here and on the map as "Petera", and the adjective is sometimes said to be "Peteran", but a couple of articles have referred to "Petra" and "Petran", or "Petara" and "Petaran". Is it safe to assume that "Petera" and "Peteran" are canonical (flavor element of misspellings aside)? -Slitherrr

I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --Msallen
Yeah, I got into the redirects before I knew what I was getting into. -Slitherrr
PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency
consistent spelling is an anachronism.
Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably
Note: Wikis are an anachronism. -Slitherrr