Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sentinel"

From Sourcebook Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Seems like a straightforward fighting type.  Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills?  The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.
 
Seems like a straightforward fighting type.  Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills?  The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.
 +
 +
Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms?  I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table.

Revision as of 12:31, 27 July 2009

Seems like a straightforward fighting type. Maybe 2+INT skillpoints/level rather than 3(for the evens/odds thing) with fighter class skills? The fewer skill points coupled with the fewer hitpoints make a bit of sense, since he gains the equivalent of a feat every two levels (like a fighter), but also gains mini-feat effects with the +1 AoO's in the levels between those that have a bit broader scope than the Ranger abilities, which would keep him from having Ranger-y skillpoints and skills.

Also, should Whirlwind Attack only apply to pole arms? I'm also assuming that the AoO's already do, but it's not noted on the table.