Difference between revisions of "Talk:Templar"
(New page: Does this class require divine spellcasting ability? Its not clear if it does. Also, should it grant access to the travel domain? --~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Does this class require divine spellcasting ability? Its not clear if it does. | + | Does this class require divine spellcasting ability? Its not clear if it does. If it doesn't, you might consider treating it like the blackguard prestige so its not a wash for warrior classes that take it. |
| − | --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | + | Also, I looked at the complete divine for some ideas, but there wasn't much. Their templar (temple defender) gets a lot of extra smite abilities like yours has. Theirs gives some damage reduction and bonus feats, which I don't think is nearly as creative or flavorful as your movement-enhancing feature. |
| + | ' | ||
| + | The only thing I thought was neat was a feature called ''Mettle'', which is an ''Evasion'' for will and fort saves. Any spell that has a 'will partial' or 'fort half' save have no effect effect on save with this feature. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] 20:50, 2 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 2 February 2009
Does this class require divine spellcasting ability? Its not clear if it does. If it doesn't, you might consider treating it like the blackguard prestige so its not a wash for warrior classes that take it.
Also, I looked at the complete divine for some ideas, but there wasn't much. Their templar (temple defender) gets a lot of extra smite abilities like yours has. Theirs gives some damage reduction and bonus feats, which I don't think is nearly as creative or flavorful as your movement-enhancing feature. ' The only thing I thought was neat was a feature called Mettle, which is an Evasion for will and fort saves. Any spell that has a 'will partial' or 'fort half' save have no effect effect on save with this feature.
--Msallen 20:50, 2 February 2009 (EST)
