Difference between revisions of "Apology of Antioch"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Written by the [[Antioch I]], the [[Sorcerer-King]] of Hakan Free City. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]]. | + | Written by the [[Antioch I]], the [[Sorcerer-King]] of Hakan Free City. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the [[Second Council of Ubrect]] in the [[Canon of Orthodoxy]]. It takes the name "Apology" because the only truly coherent parts are an apologia for the pride that led to his original belief that he was the savior designated by the Prophecy that led to his own disastrous, one-man assault on the imprisoned [[Dark Fiend]] in 31 [[BI]]. |
Latest revision as of 15:34, 7 February 2009
Written by the Antioch I, the Sorcerer-King of Hakan Free City. It is written in verse and laden with metaphor and allusion. Some consider it historical while others read it as prophetic. Such controversy is the primary reason it was not included by the Second Council of Ubrect in the Canon of Orthodoxy. It takes the name "Apology" because the only truly coherent parts are an apologia for the pride that led to his original belief that he was the savior designated by the Prophecy that led to his own disastrous, one-man assault on the imprisoned Dark Fiend in 31 BI.
