Difference between revisions of "Talk:Petera"
From Sourcebook Wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So this is referred to here and on the map as "Petera", and the adjective is sometimes said to be "Peteran", but a couple of articles have referred to "Petra" and "Petran", or "Petara" and "Petaran". Is it safe to assume that "Petera" and "Peteran" are canonical (flavor element of misspellings aside)? -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | So this is referred to here and on the map as "Petera", and the adjective is sometimes said to be "Peteran", but a couple of articles have referred to "Petra" and "Petran", or "Petara" and "Petaran". Is it safe to assume that "Petera" and "Peteran" are canonical (flavor element of misspellings aside)? -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
: I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | : I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] | ||
| + | ::Yeah, I got into the redirects before I knew what I was getting into. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
: PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency | : PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency | ||
:: consistent spelling is an anachronism. | :: consistent spelling is an anachronism. | ||
| − | ::: Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. | + | ::: Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably |
| + | ::::Note: Wikis are an anachronism. -[[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 21 April 2010
Cleared old talk page. Check history if really interested. -Slitherrr
So this is referred to here and on the map as "Petera", and the adjective is sometimes said to be "Peteran", but a couple of articles have referred to "Petra" and "Petran", or "Petara" and "Petaran". Is it safe to assume that "Petera" and "Peteran" are canonical (flavor element of misspellings aside)? -Slitherrr
- I tried to define a canonical spelling by choosing a single name and a single valid link, but I see you went and ruined that plan ;) --Msallen
- Yeah, I got into the redirects before I knew what I was getting into. -Slitherrr
- PS. GM likes the confusing lack of spelling consistency
- consistent spelling is an anachronism.
- Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably
- Note: Wikis are an anachronism. -Slitherrr
- Additionally, don't forget to account for regional spelling variances. -gm, probably
- consistent spelling is an anachronism.
